When I was a child I listened to the adults arguing & noticed that often they were NOT talking about the same things even though they must have been arguing about something
. Nowadays, as politics, religion, this blog & other conversations go, evolution of dialogues hasn't shown much improvement. This one is no exception. As an adult, though, I have developed a sense both withface-to-face & in written & other forms of language that tells me whether another groks what I am talking about. I get from you that the feeling of your just using my comments as a touchstone or trigger for material previously running around in your mind. In other words you are talking about something else. I have been talking about consciousness. There are special words in English which consciousness grasps differently than concrete objects such as: NOW, I, nothing, IS, existence, space, .....
I say there is no representation for those words. One has to have a special or focused consciousness to grok
these; the word
grok being invented by Heinlein because he needed it to describe such consciousness.
I put no limits on shareability, your current buzzword, cuz there is no need to, why? The closest thing I got to shareability is my post on [item 18358]. I wonder if you can get to what part is representation & where is that that was shareable & what is it? Music is one of the few arts which has to be alive (performed) to experience, not like sculpture, poetry, painting, architecture, & even drama which are experienced from the residue. Such being as is in music causes me to believe that it is a portal, medium & model for a better world of people interacting.