Eiamyme 2015-01-28 00:52:59 [item 18097]
seth 2015-01-27 20:03:02 [item 18097]
your title might make some sense to me if it specified to whom which words have no meaning. for example, the word "Mark" has no meaning to a mouse. sans that kind of rational communication this whole item just means to me that you are trying to degrade the use of our language.
Nope! it is more appropriate to the about [item 18096] - a word treated as just part of the experience infinite loop loses meaning except to he who is having the experience; proclaiming the Me(I); losing definition as belonging to someone else.
well yes .... of course word meanings must be shared, else they are no good for the purposes of communication. there i nothing in the symbols themselves that mean anything. if that is what your title is saying, then kudos, i agree.