Well certainly i am talking about my experience ... and my experience of my experience (awareness and self awareness) ... and that includes my awareness of the stories i tell about my experience and my self awareness. When i contemplate my self i experience all kinds of different qualia from time to time, some quite intense, others not.
If you are defining your word "being" as referring to something that exists outside of my experience, then no, i would not be talking about that and calling it "my being". If it is outside of my experience, then i just call it "otherness" ... er, notwithstanding that everything is
connected in this grand texture of existence.
And sure, i can imagine part of me existing outside of my experience according to RS (and others)'s instructions. But that is an experience of a different sort ... to me it is an imagination. And, no, i have not developed it. I'm not so very sure it would have any value to the world at large ... there being plenty such stories out there already.
hmmm ... but now that you mention it
... i am
trying to develop a image of humanity that is even apart from my self yet i move that part of it that is my experience.
So i guess it is pretty much back to: my story, or you story, or RS's or PR's or Abraham Hick's or Obama's. People pick and choose ... the ones that work the best ... that feel better to more people will survive the longest. The only problem seems to be those people insisting that there is just one story
, and it is is The Story
, and it, of course, just gots to be my story