Does a mirror work as an analogy?

Si says ...
You don’t have mirrors, at least I never said that. External reality is a mirror. It does not contain the emotions you feel, or the thoughts you think, does it? It is not your complete experience, is it? Isn’t it only a sensory reflection of a part of your experience? The part of your experience that is easy to share with others because they also have senses so they can view this partial representation of your experience too?

Reality … is your experience. Reality is complete. Your experience is the only thing you know that is so complete, so exact, the thing that contains everything that represents all that you know, is it not? External reality is not like that. It is only there, only accessible, when you are having an experience. When you are experiencing Port Angeles you can access Port Angeles. When you are not experiencing it, you can’t access it. At best, you can only imagine it right? At least, try and access something new about Port Angeles when you are not there and next time you are there, see if that new thing is in your experience. I bet it won’t be. It must have been imagination.

Your reality is your experience of it. Your reality experience travels. As it travels, the external mirror provides your senses with a representation of the reality experience you are having. This way you can experience it as something more than imagination, and as something that others can share with their senses. Wherever your reality experience is not traveling this moment is not in the sensory mirror … you can’t see it there. If you are not in China, you can’t see China, you can only imagine it.

But don’t get lost in all this contemplation. Simply go back to the beginning of this comment, this idea. What is out there is not complete. It does not contain all the elements of reality. It does not contain all the elements of your experience. That alone is enough to recognize what is out there as something less than reality … something like a reflection. It has all the elements a reflection has, and nothing more … at least nothing more that one is not imagining there between the looks they take at it with their senses. What is happening in the mirror out there when we are not looking, we don’t know. No one does. No one is experiencing it … therefore it is not reality. That too is like a mirror. When you are not standing in front of a mirror, you don’t exist in the mirror, do you? You only exist in the mirror when you are looking in the mirror.

Comments


External #actuality is not a mirror.  It is true that I cannot find where it contain the emotions I feel, or the thoughts i  think … no those are elements of my subjective  #reality.   There is no reason to confuse those two radically different domains.    We have started to call my subjective #reality my complete experience … fine, that is what we point out when we talk about my experience and what i feel and think and even how i experience how i move in #actuality.   Isn’t #actuality only a sensory reflection of a part of my experience?  NO!   Now what i experience of #actuality is certainly #informed by my experience, but that does not imply that it is some kind of mirror image of that experience.  The part of my experience that i share with others would not happen without me and others being our respective parts of the whole of  #actuality.

#munging our internal #reality with  external #actuality is like confusing the part with the whole.  The relationship between those two distinct domains is not that of a mirror.  That appears to me to be just a mental trick you do to justify the way you talk about what is not you yourself.

The confusion can also be the very idea that there is subjective and objective. Those very concepts were invented in order to explain things in terms of another reality “out there”.

It is equally valid to realize that there is only one reality and what is “out there” is a reflection of it. That works just as well to explain everything … and in fact explains many things we experience that the subjective / objective model does not … and, it is simpler and easier to use once one develops proficiency with it.

Subjective and objective is not a fact, and does not absolutely describe reality. It is just a map humans have been using until they have come to believe that map is the actual territory.
 

yep, once one starts denying “out there”, one must discard all manner of other concepts that serve us well … especially where we remain only with  mental generalizations.  

For example I can take  any observation  and point out that aspect of it that is objective and independant of the being reporting it,  and that aspect of the a report with is dependant on the observers subjective #reality.  Drawing that distinction is a useful tool allowing  me to better match up and synchronize my #reality with others and with #actuality. 

Sure, abandon the distinction if you don’t care to do that … and yes you will garner more freedom for yourself … but bear in mind that the freedom pole in a spectrum from freedom-to-restraint  is the same pole as meaninglessness ← which is a generalization that i started toying with this very morning null

Try that out for yourself.   Take some kind of creation that you manifest … even something mundane so that your feelings about it will not dominate the patterns you notice.  Give yourself more and more freedom in how you manifest that thing.  See if you can notice it becomming more or less meaningful even to yourself as how you do it becomes more and more just whatever.

There are other ways, there are other maps, to sync up with others. I agree a map is helpful, but there are others. This one you are using until it is all you know is not the only one … and I say not even the best one.

You have used this subjective/objective map until it has become how you think and what you know. When you think, you always reference this map. Another person, with a different map, may see features and pathways you never knew were there because they were not on your map. Another map may be more useful, or more complete. But you have used this map you are using so long and honored it so deeply that it is no longer easy for you to separate the map from your way of thinking and any attempt to do so feels like chaos or insanity … it feels like the destruction of all that you know and are comfortable with. It feels like you will no longer be able to communicate with the others who are also using this map.  

My current map does not assigning meaning to something based on it being out there or in here. I don’t think in that duality (not as much as I used to anyway). Meaning comes to me via feelings. The feeling I receive from a thing is what is important.

Inside and outside has a usefulness only in practical communication with others, but as a point of perspective only. In my own concept of how things relate, there is no inside or outside, it is all just me, my experience, and most important, how I feel. The feelings ARE what we are always trying to obtain. No matter what we do or think, what we call desire, as beings, is ALWAYS related to moving toward a better feeling.

When we communicate with others, what is far more useful than facts or perspective of inside and outside, is how we feel. The “external as a mirror map” allows us to more easily focus on feelings and the sharing of those with others and less on the facts and other things that are not what we are all actually going for as we live. In actuality, it allows us to communicate better … moves us all closer to the source of the meanings we are actually desiring. No one ever desires money, or a car … people always desire the feeling that they think having money, or a car, will give them. The reality is a mirror model allows people to focus on aspects of feeling foremost instead of the separatism of physical things the subject/objective model emphasizes. #ThisIsGood

Well it is true:  when i navigate #actuality “out there” i use a map.   When the map dies, i am lost in that world.  This last week has demonstrated that fact quite dramatically.  Our solution …  Elaine started using it first on the trip … was to use our senses … to look for signs with our eyes … to use the territory itself, the #actuality, as the map.  The extent to which our sensual signals were a reflection of our previous experience, was exactly the extent to which we turned down the wrong path.  Your “sensual mirror” map does not work for me. 

I am totally with you … there must be millions of other maps that i am not using … i am open to discovering them … but i an not going to GPS thinking my senses are only mirroring my own experience … that map has died for me.

Good start. Know that on that path you will eventually realize that the information you are currently believing is coming to you through your senses is actually coming from beyond your senses and your senses are simply the channel you are allowing it in with, the primary one you are focused on.

We all have GPS built in. It is our emotions. One emotion is more important for navigation than all others. It is the emotion of excitement. (other emotions are important for other reasons, such as love). Our emotion of excitement is always telling us what is the best way for us to go in every situation.

We can access the emotion of excitement through our senses. We can look around and see “things” and “directions” and notice a lot. In that noticing, some directions feel better, more exciting, to look in so we focus more there … that is the right sense to follow.

An ideal way to navigate reality experience is to pay very close attention to the emotion of excitement at all times and follow it’s guidance diligently. Then one does not need physical maps, and GPS computers, or anything sensory based to navigate with. For instance, if you were purely following your guidance of excitement on your adventure with Elaine (and maybe you were to a degree) then you would have turned at the exact right time to have the best possible adventure you could ever wish to have (and perhaps you did). But you needed nothing other than attention to your emotion of excitement for that to take place. The rest of what you did do, all the physical and sensory and memory stuff, was to get you outside of the fixed reality maps you were currently using, your expectations, so that you could receive an unexpected impulse to follow.

It is paying better attention to something that improves navigation ability though the reality experience that is desired … but not specifically more attention to sensory information. What actually improves the experience is attention to the emotion of excitement. Some people have merged those. Some people use their senses to discover what is exciting and tend in that direction naturally. But in all cases, it is the emotion that is the guidance. The senses are there to receive and delight in the experience and to view the experiences of others!

Well you say,  “When we communicate with others, what is far more useful than facts or perspective of inside and outside, is how we feel” .   But sorry crying, in my experience i have found the best sharing to happen differently.   When i am focused only on myself … only on what excites me … only my own intentions, perceptions, and changes … well then i am oblivious to what is exciting others and the #actuality obtaining around us.  I then tend to miss most of what could be shared.  #OMG null i can remember so many times that happened in my life.

However when i become acutely aware of what another is expressing of their feelings and intentions and observations, and if my own feelings and intentions are tuned complimentary, and if i am acutely tuned to the #actuality surrounding both of us, then sharing that  moment best happens for both of us.
I love when that happens null.

I describe that as “living in the world with others”  rather than living in my my own little #reality .

Mathmatically:  my #reality + others #reality + #actuality >  my #reality  

Or said differently, my box is bigger than yours null

I do not know what you are actually focusing on. It would not be excitement if things break down as you say. Other things can be mistaken for excitement and I have explained them here several times before.

When you are focused on your excitement, you will be in the best possible place to respond to others. There is no exception to this. It works every single time. Whatever best possible interaction and outcome is available in any moment, for all interacting, is available though the emotion of highest excitement … and for each person, not just you.

You can test this anytime you wish. I have, over and over. It has never failed. What does fail is my ability to stay on a path of following my excitement moment to moment to moment. That is not so easy as it sounds. It is easy to get side tracked by shiny things and rabbits to follow down enticing and mysterious holes, that look great, but are not actually highest excitement … and those are the places best interaction with others break down. Never when actually following excitement. True highest excitement is always the indicator of the path of greatest harmony for all.  

Also, “focusing on yourself” is not the same thing as following excitement. One is rarely focused on their self when looking around to see what feels exciting. The feeling of excitement comes all by itself, just like all feelings do. One does not need to be focused internally to notice it. It’s just there and noticeable if one has any emotional acuity at all. It simply wells up when attention outside falls upon that which is most exciting.

It is interesting to me that whenever you talk about my philosophy you characterize it as “focus on self”. My philosophy is the understanding that all is self, all is one. But it has very little “focus on self” at all. Focus is wanted to be “out there” on the greater part of me, not on my self identity … which would be quite boring and unproductive. I am highly interested in life and interaction with others. That is my prime goal in every story. In fact, I would tend to say that my philosophy has less focus on self than yours, even when meditating. Somehow, you seem to have things all turned around.


Well most of that hangs together well now that i have looked at it over time.  But over here it is more a breathing in and a breathing out … so that your assertions like …

When you are focused on your excitement, you will be in the best possible place to respond to others. There is no exception to this. It works every single time. Whatever best possible interaction and outcome is available in any moment, for all interacting, is available though the emotion of highest excitement … and for each person, not just you.

nathan
go clunk over here. 

For me, this thing you call “excitement” is an energy thing … sometimes this  energy (this  spirit) comes from within and then i express it with enthusiasm  … other times it comes from without and then i absorb it with glee.  I am aware both times.   Were it always to come only from within, like you talk, then my life would be quite different than it is being now.  I don’t think i would like that.  That energy flow doesn’t feel exciting to me.

On focus of self me thinks we are in violent agreement null … to me it is mostly boring and distracting.  Like the #MirrorMirrorBack photographs i keep doing.  i can suppose it is useful for awareness of the whole process to be experienced … so as such i tend to abstract it like a variable.  Wow, i wonder what mark will do with that goodie null

It is interesting to note your last paragraph … sometimes things do not come out the way we intend … at the end you talked of me not yourself … your point comparing the two.   But when you talked of me you lied … trust me on that, i know myself quite better than you ever could … especially that part of me which breaths out …  that last paragraph was all your own “self awareness” … #MirrorMirrorBack stuff all the way down null

It is interesting to me that whenever you talk about my philosophy you characterize it as “focus on self”. My philosophy is the understanding that all is self, all is one. But it has very little “focus on self” at all. Focus is wanted to be “out there” on the greater part of me, not on my self identity … which would be quite boring and unproductive. I am highly interested in life and interaction with others. That is my prime goal in every story. In fact, I would tend to say that my philosophy has less focus on self than yours, even when meditating. Somehow, you seem to have things all turned around.

nathan
when i breath out … it works best if you breath in … maybe think of it that way.

”But over here it is more a breathing in and a breathing out” – Seth

Yep, #CycleOfDoing is a breathing cycle.

“sometimes it comes from within and then i express it with enthusiasm  … other times it comes from without and i absorb it with glee.” ~ Seth

Yep, “One does not need to be focused internally to notice it. It’s just there and noticeable if one has any emotional acuity at all. It simply wells up when attention outside falls upon that which is most exciting.” ~ Nathan

“but when you talked of me you lied” ~ Seth

Nope, you simply have not moved your attention sufficiently outside your own skin to see it yet. When you do, you will. Trust me on that.  
 

well perhaps this is a hard one my friend … your last paragraph was all about yourself … it was your own intended self awareness … it would have been great if you left it at that … where you made it about me, you crossed a line which was impossible for you to cross without telling a lie and stealing some gold coins (spirit coins) from me. 

each of us is so very special, unique, particular and peculiar … we do not generalize well to each other.  i can not generalize me and apply it to you without telling a lie.  that is just how this unique identity works … otherwise we are in a whole different ball game.

incidentally where i “characterize your philosophy as focus on your self” … i am telling the same kind of lie …
null funny how that kind of interaction feeds on itself, eh?

#ThereIsOnlyOneOfMe

That spirit coin thing is a rule you picked up from someone or somewhere. Kind of like in Monopoly “if you don’t pass go, you don’t collect $200”. Life is a very flexible and expansive thing. Rules like that one where you believe there is a line that can be crossed, are made by people to protect their interests.

Your interest seems to be the very specific way you choose to live and relate to life IMHO. I agree, you seem to have that choice tied down very well … so why? Why are you sending your attention out to all these other things, like the things I represent? Why not simply live within the life boundaries you have chosen and forget about all the rest? What does looking at all the rest that is out there and available, but not taking it into your self, your own being, do for you?

well that don’t #inform me at all … its seems to be about something else … not anything  i am talking about with you … nor anything about what i said above … rather it seems to be  just another false story you are making up about me … just more of that energy flow.   #btw, i didn’t “pick up the spirit coin metaphor” anywhere … i made up the analogy up myself, #fabana … and i keep wiggelin the signs around for the odd chance that you will perceive that to which i point .. but you always look right instead, and go right for my jugular null

So you made up the game. <shrug> It’s still a game and the rules you are playing by are all made up rules. You do not have to feel like I am stealing something from you when I cross a line you have drawn on your gameboard. You can feel anyway you want, and choose to, anytime you want. If you feel me doing you wrong, it is only because of the particular game you are playing and the rules it involves. You can choose another game. You can even choose no game and no rules (except those intrinsic and natural to life itself). Interacting outside the game is Higher World interaction on the leading edge of human evolution. Playing inside a game, with rules, is what we do in the lower worlds of human interaction. What most everyone does.

oh nathan nathan nathan … i do not have any such feeling of you doing me wrong null … not wistanding that you have just written a story that i did.   You biting your own ego cookie is  all you baby, its all you … i am hardly involved.  

Fact is I am quite exhilarated with our interaction whatever you  do.   Steal as many cookies as you want to eat … it is all the same to me.  

Sorry null, what i said about you, was from my perception of you, … it was not about me.  So what you said  came as a surprise again …  i didn’t expect you to go there quite so soon.  

Of course my perception of what you say is certainly tainted by my own #egoo.  You are right, that perception is my choice.   But shucks i have tried to solve that equation so many other ways … yet i cannot ignore the constant edges of your behavior.  It is only you yourself who seem oblivious to the effect of the shit you continually make up about me … oblivious to what it does only for you, in and of itself … excused to yourself because your own made up a story that you are helping me.

But yes null … 

I totally agree … we need to cut that shit out … if we want to talk about,  what we really can’t talk about with that kind vocabulary, “Higher World interaction on the leading edge of human evolution”.

seth

When you talk about “crossing a line” and “stealing things” and “your energy flow” and “going for your juggler” … how else is anyone supposed to take it than doing you wrong?

Come on … this isn’t rocket science, just human language. You very clearly threw out all the normal language signs that you believe my “knowing about you internally” is “wronging you” somehow, and actually, you gave a lot of “hows” right there.