Action with Intent
Note not all relationships are simple SVO but can become quite complex. After all it is not a binary world.
Here the object of intending is a variable. I drew it here simply as a context.
Or perhaps more accurately according to the dialog below …
or in the peculiar case where “Being A” includes everything ….
(Unless you dig really, really, really )
perhaps the relationsiop is more accurately drawn …
note, now the purpose or intent is clearly inside of Being A.
So that what is inside or outside of it can vary … see #IAmAVariable
← here it is deemed (probably by A himself) to be all inside of himself.
so why even talk about it as if we could?
when you arrive at “IS” you have arrived at the head of the arrow …
… or said differently, it is awareness all the way down … or it is consciousness all the way down … or maybe even eveything is conscious … or maybe everything is spirit. all of those thoughts are, me thinks, crawling on the same edges … can you feel it? …. or as is popular to say, “can you feel me” ?
Hey you, out there in the cold
Getting lonely, getting old
Can you feel me?
Hey you, standing in the aisles
With itchy feet and fading smiles
Can you feel me?
Hey you, dont help them to bury the light
Don’t give in without a fight.
me, i accept the duality of respresentation and move on to what it can do.
your casting your peculiar #munge’s at me notwistanding
that i factor things differently in my mind than you do in your mind shold be something that we should just accept already yet, imho.
#btw your interaction here has actually moved my thiking along … #thanks → mark … even thought you have things all factored and connected differently. That certainly will yield the feeling to an observer from outside a mind the feeling you call #munge .
well, yes , the lower half of the relationship certainly is more exciting …
at least to me.
i still think you have an #aug against what you call “abstraction” which you would get over if only you started looking for examples of your own abstractions.
Maybe – the word dilettante
regarding your stuff comes to mind rather than your use of #aug for mine. Talking about something rather than attempting to encounter it or grasp the reality of something is kinda like masturbating to pornography only different.
Does that even need to be said?
they can even be used for meditations …. see your own Yantra thought.
everything that is happening here is in the domain of thought …
and so it necessarily is already once removed from actual human interaction.
there is no profit or useful information in your deriding of it … or of judging i should do otherwise … it is what i do here … observe and contribute (or not) just as you do and have done.
if you imply it is the only thing i do, that would be just your own
#MakeShitUp to feel right in actual human interaction towards me.seth anticipating mark’s next negative human interaction