guest
Draw
a cartoon
enter, leave, or change group
about
Shut up bitch!
on [group funnypages] by Anonymous Geek on 2009-01-06 15:06:45 [permalink 11226]





source: thedailybeast.com
Reddit co-founder Aaron Swartz is tired of tussling with federal agencies over Freedom of Information Act requests, and he wants Obama's CTO to put public government data online for all to see. "We've had to do some crazy stuff to get data out of the government," says Swartz, who also runs Watchdog.net, a hub for political data and activism. "The average programmer, the first time they have to call up a government agency, [they find] it's not worth it.”

Swartz goes even further, proposing a national project to scan the millions of paper documents that live in the National Archives, Library of Congress, and other repositories"a massive program that would dwarf Google's effort to scan library books. "Imagine if we had a public process to take this and put it online"not just for one company, Google, but for the public at large," he says.
Aaron Swartz was one of the chaps i did SWAG with ... have been following his career ever since.  It's interesting that he has started billing himself as an activist.
by seth on [group seth] at 2009-01-06 11:35:09, changed 2009-01-06 11:41:27 [permalink 11224]



youtube cartoons
Tags:
on [group funnypages] by Anonymous Geek on 2009-01-06 10:16:55, changed 2009-01-06 10:19:55 [permalink 11223]



by seth on [group funnypages] at 2009-01-06 10:09:03 [permalink 11222]
1 comment
M 2009-01-06 10:35:11 [item 11222]
previously linked, thanks.
Yes, i though it actually did "describes Blago appropriately" as you said in [item 11220] and as such needed to be seen.  I can kind of see what Blago is getting out of this circus ... but what i can't understand is why Burris is playing along.  He could just as well have stayed home like Al Franken did.  True enough, Obama is no Drama ... too bad he came from The Chicago Circus.



A Congress of Bozos
 I just had to post this one due to name recognition.

The funny thing is that Al Franken is also a bozo because of the corrupt recount about to be litigated.  Not much M$M mention on that one. The racial components of the Burris appointment are being stretched by the M$M as Blago expected when he made the appointment!
describes Blago appropriately!
by M on [group mark] at 2009-01-06 09:30:25, changed 2009-01-06 09:37:01 [permalink 11220]
6 comments
source:M above
The funny thing is that
Al Franken is also a bozo because of the corrupt recount about to be litigated.
Pending litigation a less hyperpartisan term might just be "recount".  

I watched the whole Burris circus on all the cable channels.  CNN was the most dramatic using cell phones inside the capital building, labeling the screen with WIDEBAND, and showing absolutely nothing.  I guess everybody was hoping against hope to catch a scuffle.  Just what is in this for Burris is anybody's guess - i mean why play into the hands of this head clown Blago? Would it not have been simpler just to wait?  Oh well .... perhaps this is easy distraction from the real news of the day
seth 2009-01-06 10:17:54 [item 11220]
M 2009-01-06 10:10:08 [item 11220]
The litigation is a correction for the corrupt recount!  The litigation word is not hyperpartisan which is not an n-word anyway.
I have no problem with the word "litigation" - i do have a problem with affixing the word "corrupt".   Using that modifier with no corroborated evidence is in fact a hyperpartisan act.  In fact if you actually followed the recount you would have come away with a respect for the careful bipartisan procedures of the Minnesota Canvassing Board. 

Of course a hyperpartisan is never satisfied ... i guess that's his job.
Read the already linked (on Al Freaken)  WSJ article describing the litigation proposed! If that doesn't describe corruption then it's no wonder a bozo like Blago got elected (in Ill.). I can make a link but I can't force you to read it. Anyway to someone desperately trying to coin or spread the n-word (in their mind) of hyperpartisan it's all about the meme.  I  still prefer hyperpartisan over sphinctermindedness any day!
M 2009-01-06 10:33:23 [item 11220]
seth 2009-01-06 10:17:54 [item 11220]
M 2009-01-06 10:10:08 [item 11220]
The litigation is a correction for the corrupt recount!  The litigation word is not hyperpartisan which is not an n-word anyway.
I have no problem with the word "litigation" - i do have a problem with affixing the word "corrupt".   Using that modifier with no corroborated evidence is in fact a hyperpartisan act.  In fact if you actually followed the recount you would have come away with a respect for the careful bipartisan procedures of the Minnesota Canvassing Board. 

Of course a hyperpartisan is never satisfied ... i guess that's his job.
Read the already linked (on Al Freaken)  WSJ article describing the litigation proposed! If that doesn't describe corruption then it's no wonder a bozo like Blago got elected (in Ill.). I can make a link but I can't force you to read it. Anyway to someone desperately trying to coin or spread the n-word (in their mind) of hyperpartisan it's all about the meme.  I  still prefer hyperpartisan over sphinctermindedness any day!
Obviously deeds alleged to have happened should not be deemed to have happened until after the litigation.  Using the term, "corrupt", in a sentence as if it were true, prior to litigation is hyperpartisan.  It increases the probability that the sentence will be false in the long run.  And, yes, I like my term "hyperpartisan" - it has a nice crisp easily groked meaning for a behavior that is all too rife in today's polemics.  Now what does "sphinctermindedness" mean and when should it be used?
Maybe they both should be US Senators then the comedy might have some better gags.



Draw
a cartoon
enter, leave, or change group
about